Clinical template
Cardiology consult note template with examples
Cardiology history is symptom clusters, not a single HPI paragraph: chest pain character, heart-failure symptoms, syncope, and palpitations each change the workup. The template below follows Scribeberry's Cardiology Consult, which prompts for each cluster separately and ends with an impression and a plan per diagnosis.

Cardiology consult note
Ready to review- Visit details pulled in
- Letter drafted from the conversation
- Your review and signature
Key takeaways
- A cardiology consult note characterizes symptoms precisely and correlates them with ECG, troponin timing, and imaging before stating the plan.
- Documented negatives (no radiation, no diaphoresis, no exertional pattern) carry as much weight as positives.
- Every recommendation needs a drug, a dose, and an owner — 'consider' is not a plan.
What is a cardiology consult note?
A cardiology consult note (cardiology consultation note) is the written record of a specialist cardiac assessment performed at another clinician's request. It documents the reason for consultation, a symptom-cluster history — chest pain, heart failure symptoms, syncope, palpitations, and rhythm symptoms each in their own section — cardiovascular risk factors, past cardiac history, medications, a focused cardiovascular examination, the investigations and laboratory results reviewed, and an impression with a plan for each diagnosis. The symptom clusters are the point of a cardiology consult template: each one carries discriminating details that a single undifferentiated history paragraph tends to lose.
This cardiology consult note template matches the section structure of Scribeberry's built-in Cardiology Consult. Copy the blank template into any EMR, or generate the note from the recorded or dictated visit and review it before it enters the chart.
How to write a cardiology consult note, step by step
- Name the referral question: chest pain risk stratification, syncope, heart failure management, pre-operative assessment, and rhythm evaluation each end in a different plan.
- Take chest pain as its own history: onset, character, site and radiation, exertional and rest pattern, duration, associated symptoms, and what relieves it.
- Ask the heart failure cluster separately: dyspnea and its threshold, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, edema, and weight trend, including the denials.
- Reconstruct syncope from prodrome, triggers, witness account, and speed of recovery; this sorts cardiac from reflex causes better than any single test.
- Characterize palpitations by onset and offset, regularity, triggers, and associated chest pain, dyspnea, or syncope.
- List modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors and reconcile cardiac medications with actual adherence, not the chart's intention.
- Review the investigations yourself: ECG, troponin pattern, BNP, echo measurements, monitors, and prior stress or imaging, with dates.
- Finish with an impression and a plan per diagnosis: medication started or changed, investigations requested, follow-up interval, and what the referring clinician should do in the gap.
Blank cardiology consult template
Copy this into your EMR, or use it as a Scribeberry custom template. Leave a symptom cluster blank only when you asked and it was denied; that denial is often the finding the referrer needs.
Cardiology consultation note
ID / reason for consultation: Chief complaint: History of present illness: Chest pain symptoms (onset, character, radiation, exertional pattern, associated symptoms): Heart failure symptoms (dyspnea, orthopnea, PND, edema, weight change): Pericarditis symptoms (positional, pleuritic, recent illness): Syncope history (prodrome, triggers, witness account, recovery): Bradycardia or tachycardia symptoms: Palpitations (onset/offset, regularity, triggers, associated chest pain or syncope): Other rhythm issues: Cardiovascular risk factors (lipids, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, family history): Past medical history (known CAD, HF, valve disease, devices, prior interventions): Medications (antianginals, anticoagulation, antiarrhythmics, adherence): Allergies: Focused cardiovascular examination (vitals, JVP, murmurs, edema, pulses): Investigations reviewed (ECG, troponin, BNP, echo, stress testing, monitors, imaging): Laboratory results: Impression and plan, per diagnosis: 1. [Diagnosis] — plan, investigations, medication changes, follow-up interval: 2. [Diagnosis] — plan: Recommendations to the referring clinician:
Fictional patients
Every example on this page uses made-up names and findings. They are teaching material, not a substitute for college standards, CCS guidance, or your own clinical judgment. Review every generated note before it enters the chart.
Example: exertional chest pain referral
59-year-old man, exertional pressure with a normal resting ECG
Ottawa, referred by family doctor. Fictional.
Reason for consultation: Exertional chest discomfort, risk stratification. HPI: Six weeks of central chest pressure climbing two flights of stairs, eases within 3 minutes of rest. No pain at rest, no nocturnal symptoms. No dyspnea, orthopnea, edema, syncope, or palpitations. Risk factors: Hypertension on amlodipine, LDL above target on no statin, ex-smoker (quit 2019, 20 pack-years), father MI at 61. No diabetes. Examination: BP 138/84, HR 68 regular. JVP normal, no murmurs, lungs clear, no edema. Investigations: Resting ECG normal sinus rhythm, no ischemic changes. Troponin not indicated and not sent for this stable outpatient presentation. No prior echo or stress testing. Impression and plan: 1. Stable exertional angina, CCS class II, until proven otherwise — exercise stress echocardiogram requested; start ASA 81 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg today; metoprolol 25 mg BID titrated to symptoms; sublingual nitroglycerin prescribed with written instructions on when to present to ED. Activity advice given: stop-and-rest threshold, no snow shovelling until testing complete. 2. Hypertension — continue amlodipine, recheck BP at follow-up. Follow-up with me after stress echo, sooner by phone if pain occurs at rest or lasts over 10 minutes. Referring clinician: please arrange fasting lipids and A1c before that visit.
Who uses a cardiology consult note, and when
Cardiologists and internists write cardiology consult notes in outpatient clinics, chest-pain services, and inpatient consultation; family physicians use the structure for pre-referral workups and shared-care follow-up.
- Chest pain, dyspnea, palpitation, syncope, and murmur referrals.
- Pre-operative cardiac risk assessments.
- Heart-failure and post-MI shared-care reviews.
- Inpatient consultations where recommendations must be actionable the same day.
- Device and arrhythmia follow-up with ECG or monitor correlation.
Documentation, privacy, and record-keeping in Canada
Cardiology notes turn on negatives and numbers: the chest-pain features that were absent, the exact ECG interpretation, troponin timing, and ejection fraction. Record symptom characterization (onset, character, radiation, timing, exacerbating and relieving factors) and cardiovascular risk factors explicitly, because downstream decisions — antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, driving advice — are audited against them. In Canada, fitness-to-drive reporting duties for cardiac conditions vary by province and must be documented when exercised.
Across Canada, clinical notes form part of the legal medical record. Provincial regulators expect entries that are contemporaneous, factual, and attributable; health information is handled under provincial privacy law (such as PHIPA in Ontario, the HIA in Alberta, and Law 25 in Quebec) and PIPEDA where it applies. Disclose the minimum necessary, with patient consent, and record amendments as amendments — never by overwriting the original entry.
Common mistakes that weaken a cardiology consult note
- Writing 'chest pain, resolved' with no characterization or risk factors.
- Citing an ECG as 'normal' with no rate, rhythm, intervals, or comparison to prior tracings.
- Omitting troponin timing relative to symptom onset.
- A plan that says 'consider beta blocker' with no drug, dose, or owner.
- No functional capacity (METs) in a pre-operative assessment.
- Missing driving or occupational advice after syncope or an acute coronary event.
The signing checklist
Before signing: Is the reason for the encounter explicit? Are negatives that change management recorded? Does every diagnosis have a plan with an owner and a date? Are results, counselling, and follow-up documented — or only intended?
Writing the history so the plan writes itself
- Separate the symptom clusters. 'No heart failure symptoms' documented once is worth more than a generic negative review of systems.
- Syncope needs the witness version and the recovery, not just 'passed out.' Prodrome and triggers sort cardiac from reflex syncope.
- Palpitations: onset and offset (sudden vs gradual) and regularity do more diagnostic work than duration alone.
- End with an impression and a plan per diagnosis, the structure Scribeberry's Cardiology Consult generates, so meds, tests, and follow-up are never stranded in the history.
- Name what the referring clinician should do before the next visit; consults fail in the gap between appointments.
Generate the consult from the interview
Scribeberry's Cardiology Consult drafts each symptom cluster, risk factors, investigations, and a per-diagnosis impression and plan from the recorded or dictated visit. You review before Smart Push into Jane, Accuro, OSCAR, or any web EMR.
Symptom clusters and what each one decides
| Cluster | Details that change management | Common documentation failure |
|---|---|---|
| Chest pain | Exertional pattern, rest pain, duration, relief | 'Chest pain, atypical' with no pattern recorded |
| Heart failure | Dyspnea threshold, orthopnea, PND, edema, weight trend | Generic negative review of systems |
| Syncope | Prodrome, triggers, witness account, recovery speed | 'Passed out, ?cause' with no reconstruction |
| Palpitations | Sudden vs gradual onset/offset, regularity, triggers | Duration recorded, character missing |
| Risk factors | Lipids, BP, diabetes, smoking, family history, adherence | Medication list copied without adherence |
Example 2: syncope in a young athlete
19-year-old varsity athlete, exertional syncope
Kingston, referred after collapse at training. Fictional.
Reason for consultation: Exertional syncope, return-to-play advice. History: Collapsed at peak exertion during interval training, witnessed: no prodrome reported by teammates, brief convulsive jerks, recovered within a minute, no tongue bite or incontinence. One prior episode of near-syncope climbing stairs last season, not reported. No chest pain, palpitations, or dyspnea. No family history of sudden death; father has hypertension. No medications, supplements, or energy-drink excess before training. Examination: BP 118/72, HR 58. No murmur at rest or with Valsalva today. Lungs clear. Investigations reviewed: ECG from ED shows sinus bradycardia with early repolarization, QTc 410 ms, no pre-excitation, no Brugada pattern. Troponin normal. Echo requested and pending; no prior imaging. Impression and plan: 1. Exertional syncope, cardiac cause not excluded — this presentation (peak exertion, no prodrome, witnessed convulsive syncope) is treated as potentially arrhythmic or structural until the workup says otherwise. No training or competition until assessment is complete; letter provided to coach and athletic department today. 2. Investigations: echocardiogram requested, exercise stress test and rhythm monitoring to follow depending on echo; cardiology review with results within 2 weeks, sooner if any recurrence. Emergency advice documented: any chest pain, palpitations with collapse, or repeat syncope means ED immediately, not the training room. Referring clinician: please hold return-to-play clearance regardless of how well he feels, and send any prior ECGs for comparison.
Frequently asked questions
What should a cardiology consult note include?
Reason for consultation, a symptom-cluster history (chest pain, heart failure, pericarditis, syncope, bradycardia/tachycardia, palpitations), cardiovascular risk factors, past cardiac history, medications, a focused cardiovascular examination, investigations and labs reviewed, and an impression with a plan for each diagnosis.
Why separate chest pain, syncope, and palpitations into their own sections?
Each cluster has discriminating details a single HPI paragraph tends to lose: exertional pattern for angina, prodrome and witness account for syncope, onset/offset and regularity for palpitations. Documenting denials in each cluster also shows the referring clinician the questions were asked.
Does Scribeberry have a cardiology consult template?
Yes. Cardiology Consult is a built-in Scribeberry template that prompts for each symptom cluster and ends with a per-diagnosis impression and plan. You edit the generated note before it enters the EMR.
Can I copy this into my EMR?
Yes. Paste the blank template into Jane, Accuro, OSCAR, TELUS, or any EMR template library, or keep it as a Scribeberry custom template so consults are generated in this structure.
What is the most important part of a cardiology consult note?
The symptom characterization and the objective correlation — ECG, troponin timing, imaging, and ejection fraction — tied to an explicit, owned plan for each problem.
Should old ECGs be mentioned?
Yes. Stating whether the ECG was compared with prior tracings materially changes interpretation of ST-T abnormalities and is a standard expectation in cardiology documentation.
References
- Good practices in medical record keeping — Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA)
- Medical Records Documentation — practice standard — College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO)
- Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) — Government of Ontario
- Guidelines and clinical resources — Canadian Cardiovascular Society
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada — Heart and Stroke Foundation
Examples on this page are fictional and for illustration only; they do not describe real patients. Templates reflect the corresponding built-in template in Scribeberry at the date above.